Republicans Push for Tax on Remittances
Republican proposals to tax remittances by up to 37% spark alarm among activists and Latin American governments.
2025-05-15T21:12:49+00:00
Publicado el 15/05/2025 a las 21:12
- Taxes on Remittances Up to 37%
- Activists Fear Increased Migration
- Remittances Sustain Latin American Economies
Two Republican-backed bills aim to impose taxes on remittances sent from the U.S., a move that could deepen irregular migration and destabilize Latin American economies, activists warn.
Why taxes on remittances matter:
Remittances account for up to 30% of GDP in some Central American countries and are essential for the survival of millions of families. Implementing taxes on remittances would directly impact their economies and increase migratory pressure toward the U.S.
The proposals at stake:
- The “Big and Beautiful Border Security Bill” includes a 5% tax on remittances sent by undocumented immigrants and those with temporary immigration status.
- The “Border Security Investment Act” proposes a 37% levy on transfers to the five countries with the highest number of illegal entries into the U.S.
What activists say about taxes on remittances:
- Juan José Gutiérrez, from the Full Rights for Immigrants Coalition:
“This doesn’t solve undocumented migration. It makes it worse. The root cause is poverty, and this tax (on remittances) only deepens it.” - Teresa Tejada, director of ASOSAL:
“It would be an economic catastrophe. Remittances are the lifeline for thousands of families.”
Context:
Both proposals align with the immigration agenda of former President Donald Trump. The 5% tax on remittances would help fund his plan for tax breaks and border security. While the bills currently lack the votes for passage, they could be added to an amended version with broader support.
Between the lines:
The tax would apply to immigrants with various statuses, except U.S. citizens. Trump previously supported such measures during his first term.
International reaction:
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum harshly criticized the proposal:
“How can they tax something when people already pay taxes there, whether they have documents or not?”
And furthermore:
Republican Congressman Carlos Giménez called for a total ban on remittances to Cuba as punishment for the regime, fueling debate over the political use of remittance flows.
You may also be interested in: Trump Promises Historic Drug Price Cuts of Up to 80%

