Supreme Court Backs Trump on Venezuelan Deportations

Supreme Court Backs Trump on Venezuelan Deportations
Reported by AP
Here Are the Details

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld the Trump administration’s use of a colonial-era law to deport Venezuelan migrants.

However, the ruling stipulates that such deportations can only occur following prior judicial review.

In a narrow 5–4 vote, the court authorized the application of the Alien Enemies Act — a statute from the 18th century rarely invoked since World War II — to remove Venezuelans from the country who are accused by the government of having ties to gangs.

However, the decision requires that migrants be given a “reasonable amount of time” to present their case in a federal court.

Supreme Court Backs Trump on Venezuelan Deportations

BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court supports Trump, gives green light for summary deportation of Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act https://t.co/1kycs0znzg pic.twitter.com/O1VPSMHVY3

– AlbertorodNews (@albertorodnews) April 7, 2025

The ruling also specifies that court proceedings must take place in Texas, rather than in Washington, D.C., as had been requested in earlier appeals.

This decision follows an emergency appeal by the White House, after a federal court in Washington had temporarily blocked the use of the Alien Enemies Act for deporting Venezuelans.

The case has become a flashpoint amid escalating tensions between the executive branch and the federal judiciary.

Especially concerning immigration enforcement and recent actions targeting Venezuelan nationals under national security grounds.

Split Opinions on the Deportations of Venezuelans

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Donald Trump, allowing him to continue deporting Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador.

Via: @Scotusblog pic.twitter.com/mhxhksxzft

– 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙖 (@Polianalitica) April 7, 2025

The Court’s conservative majority sided with the Trump administration, stating that the executive retains broad authority over immigration matters during emergencies or national conflicts.

In a forceful dissent, the liberal justices criticized the ruling, asserting that “the Court now rewards the government for its conduct.”

Referencing what they view as deliberate attempts to avoid legal oversight.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, although generally conservative, partially broke from her colleagues and aligned with some aspects of the dissenting opinion.

Reactions and Possible Consequences

U.S. Supreme Court supports Trump, authorizes deportation of Venezuelans https://t.co/pztkdrrwzg

— El Público TV (@elpublicotv) April 7, 2025

The ruling sustains a highly controversial legal mechanism used by President Trump to justify immediate deportations based on alleged criminal ties — particularly with the gang known as Tren de Aragua.

Multiple human rights organizations have challenged the legitimacy of these claims, citing insufficient evidence in many instances.

Furthermore, immigration attorneys warn that the mandatory relocation of hearings to Texas may hinder migrants’ ability to mount a proper legal defense, increasing their vulnerability within the judicial system.

As the election year unfolds, this ruling could have major implications for immigration policy and the broader debate on presidential powers in times of crisis.

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN: Trump Asks Supreme Court to Block Return of Migrant Wrongfully Deported to El Salvador