Search
Press "Enter" to search and "ESC" to close.
Inicio » English » The Latest » Judge in election interference case imposes gag order on Donald Trump

Judge in election interference case imposes gag order on Donald Trump

Suscríbete a Nuestro Boletín
Recibe por email las noticias más destacadas
trial, Trump, MundoNow, Republican, highlights
Donald Trump gag order (Photo: Shutterstock)
  • Judge imposes a gag order on Donald Trump.
  • He is prohibited from making certain statements about the case.
  • What prompted this?

The federal judge overseeing the 2020 election interference case against Donald Trump in Washington, DC imposed a gag order on him Monday.

The former Republican president is prohibited from making statements directed at prosecutors, potential witnesses and the judge’s staff.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan’s order marks a milestone in the federal case.

Trump is accused of illegally conspiring to reverse his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

Donald Trump has to obey the gag order

political speech, accused, public office, United States Court, lawyer, Donald Trump gag order
PHOTO: Shutterstock

Chutkan said Trump has the right to criticize the Justice Department generally and affirm his belief that the case is politically motivated.

However, she said Trump cannot mount a “smear campaign” against prosecutors and judicial staff.

«No other criminal defendant would be allowed to do so, and I’m not going to allow it in this case,» Chutkan said.

Chutkan, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, said she would impose «sanctions as may be necessary.»

What if Donald Trump violates the gag order?

smear campaign, sanctions, violators, fines, Donald Trump gag order
Photo: Shutterstock

Judges can impose fines or jail terms for those who violate gag orders.

In this case, jailing a presidential candidate could lead to serious political consequences and pose logistical obstacles.

Meanwhile, putting a stop to Trump’s litany of abusive remarks may make the case easier to handle.

It could also fuel Trump’s accusations of political persecution.

Trump can still criticize President Biden

 Joe Biden, smear campaign, sanctions, violators, fines,

PHOTO: The Associated Press

The Trump campaign has already taken advantage of the proposed gag order in its fundraising appeals.

In addition, Trump falsely characterized it as an attempt to prevent him from criticizing Joe Biden, who took office in January 2021.

The order could end a key strategy in Trump’s campaign for the 2024 presidential nomination.

It may be just the beginning of an unprecedented fight over the limits of the speech of a defendant seeking the highest public office in the United States.

Trump’s lawyers threaten to appeal

 district judge, Tanya Chutkan, federal case, illegally conspiring, electoral defeat,
Photo: The Associated Press

Trump’s lawyers could appeal the gag order, with possible implications for the US Court.

Trump’s attorney, John Lauro, vehemently opposes the order, claiming it unconstitutionally restricts Trump’s political speech.

This legal dispute could trigger a major showdown in the judicial system.

The issue raises questions about the limits of political speech for a defendant seeking high-level public office.

Trump’s lawyers lash out

former president, statements, prosecutors, witnesses, judge's staff,
Photo: The Associated Press

“He is allowed to make statements the prosecution doesn’t like. That’s part of living with the First Amendment,” Lauro said.

Lauro declined to comment on the ruling after the hearing. A Trump spokesperson called the judge’s decision «an absolute abomination.»

The prosecutor’s team argued that Trump knew that his incendiary comments could inspire his supporters to threaten or harass people he targets.

Prosecutors said it’s part of Trump’s effort to erode the public’s faith in the justice system.

Trump doesn’t have the right say whatever he wants

federal judge, electoral subversion, Donald Trump, gag order, mundonow
Photo: The Associated Press

According to The Associated Press, Lauro accused prosecutors of seeking to censor a political candidate in the middle of a campaign.

But the judge responded that Trump “does not have the right to say and do exactly as he pleases.”

“You keep talking about censorship like the defendant has unfettered First Amendment rights. He doesn’t,” Chutkan said. “We’re not talking about censorship here.»

«We’re talking restrictions to ensure there is a fair administration of justice on this case.»

Etiquetas:
Related post
Regresar al Inicio